Ley de Régimen Electoral Transitorio [Law of the Transitory Electoral Regime] Ley del Deslinde Jurisdiccional [Law of Jurisdictional Demarcation] (Ley N◦ y Justicia e Paz: Proyecto de Ley de Coordinación Intercultural de la Justicia. Law on Jurisdictional Delimitation/Ley de Deslinde Jurisdiccional Law. / (Popular Participation Law), Ley de Participación Popular, enacted Law No/ (Jurisdictional Law), Ley de Deslinde Jurisdiccional, enacted.
|Published (Last):||13 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||13.34 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.89 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Secondly, I will provide an overview of the findings made after my official visit to Mexico regarding access to justice, indigenous systems of justice and self-determination. Access to justice and indigenous juridical systems under international standards International human rights treaties and instruments ratified and supported by Mexico affirm the obligation of States to guarantee the ability of indigenous peoples to access justice within 0773 national legal system.
An important avenue to guarantee access to justice for indigenous peoples is the recognition and promotion of their own juridical systems. On the other hand, indigenous peoples throughout Deslinre have developed numerous proposals to promote their autonomy, self-determination and justice administration, especially where federal and state responses have been inefficient or non-existent.
Bolivia aprobó una peligrosa ley de justicia indígena – Infobae
Challenges in exercising indigenous justice systems, self-government and self-determination. Coordination between indigenous and national justice system In Mexico, as in other countries, the recognition of indigenous juridical systems would also involve the establishment of mechanisms for harmonization and interface with the national or ordinary jurisdiction. In my presentation, I will begin by providing an overview of international human rights standards related to indigenous peoples’ access to justice and their own juridical systems.
In Mexico, as in other countries, the recognition of indigenous juridical systems would also involve the establishment of mechanisms for harmonization and interface with the national or ordinary jurisdiction.
Due process would depend on the particular laws and procedures of the indigenous community concerned based on its social and political organization. This needs to addressed through actions by the Supreme Court and other relevant tribunals to step up existing mechanisms to ensure enforcement of those judgments. Challenges in exercising indigenous justice systems, self-government and self-determination Article 2 of the Mexican Constitution makes an important recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights to autonomy and self-determination, including their internal forms of coexistence, their social, economic, political and cultural organization and the application of their own legal systems to resolve internal conflicts.
The lack of implementation of various judgments favorable to indigenous peoples has also undermined the effectiveness of the national justice system. There is considerable variation among the states and at the federal level with respect to the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples to elect their own authorities according to their own traditions.
The matters in which indigenous jurisdiction was deemed not to reach included, inter alia, crimes against international law; crimes against humanity; crimes against internal and external security of the State; terrorism; drug-trafficking; trafficking of persons; crimes against children; rape and homicide; and matters dealing with labor, mining, oil and gas, and forestry laws.
In this regard, there needs to be a dynamic and intercultural understanding that takes into account the diverse manifestations of human rights. This can be a useful practice to facilitate an intercultural dialogue which should be expanded in further debates and cases related to indigenous juridical systems. Therefore, avenues of dialogue, coordination and collaboration are needed between State authorities and indigenous autonomous institutions such as community police, indigenous courts, good governance councils and autonomous municipalities in areas of mutual interest.
An important starting point is ascertaining and validating the jurisdictional powers that indigenous peoples already exercise de facto. Indigenous peoples have also utilized the amparo mechanism brought about by the constitutional reform to seek protection of their rights in the context of megaprojects carried out in their lands without prior consultation. I consider that these are important programs that need to be continued and strengthened. The information I received indicated problems in the respect of due process rights of indigenous individuals before the criminal justice systems due the shortage of indigenous language interpreters, lawyers, public defenders and justice operators who speak indigenous languages.
State legislation and federal electoral court decisions have reaffirmed the rights of indigenous peoples in states like Oaxaca, Michoacan, Morelos and Guerrero to elect local and municipal authorities according to their usages and customs. Without consideration to those barriers, members of indigenous peoples before the criminal justice system may face violations of due process if they do not understand the legal procedures instituted against them.
Inicio Declaraciones International human rights perspectives on access to justice for indigenous peoples in Mexico. Promoting an intercultural understanding of human rights. Measures shall be taken to ensure that members of these peoples can understand and be understood in legal proceedings, where necessary lwy the provision of interpretation or by other juriseiccional means” art. Recommendations for further action in the promotion of indigenous justice systems.
Said review body could provide a space for true intercultural dialogue and decision-making, where the cultural context in which decisions made by indigenous authorities would be understood, respected and taken into account.
While the National Commission is not an indigenous justice system, as it is the government machinery mandated to implement the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act, limiting its quasi-judicial powers will jurisdicciomal implications on how indigenous justice systems are recognized and utilized.
International human rights treaties and instruments ratified and supported by Mexico affirm the obligation of States to guarantee the ability of indigenous peoples to access justice within the national legal system.
Convention recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples to exercise their customs, customary laws and methods for dealing with penal matters subject to fundamental human rights principles recognized in domestic and international legal sources.
The Court considered there jurisxiccional be an “intercultural consensus” on the minimum human rights requirements that indigenous authorities were to respect in their decisions.
There should not be predetermined assumptions that indigenous jurisdictional functions have to be limited to only minor infractions, desilnde it should only apply to members of the same community or people, or to only cases occurring within an indigenous peoples’ territory. According to official information received from authorities, impunity in the country is nearly absolute. I pointed out the importance of indigenous peoples to continue developing and strengthening their own legal, policy and self-determination initiatives.
I found that access to justice for indigenous peoples using the agrarian legal system could be seriously limited if current international standards on indigenous peoples’ rights to lands, territories, natural resources and other human rights are not adequately incorporated and applied by agrarian authorities.
Mexico played a leading role in the approval by the United Nations General Assembly of lwy Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples in Coordination between indigenous and national justice system.
Recommendations for further action in the promotion of indigenous justice systems The recommendations jurisdicciobal my report emphasize the need to promote and strengthen indigenous jurisdicciona, self-government and juridical systems. I will then conclude with a discussion of further areas of work in the areas of indigenous justice systems and autonomy based on the recommendations I made in my country report. When there are legitimate concerns about the observance of human rights in a decision made by an indigenous authority or about the suitability of drslinde jurisdiction for a particular matter, specialized review bodies could be devised in addition to domestic courts.
For indigenous peoples, there continue to be economic, cultural, language and geographic barriers along with racism and discrimination that limit indigenous peoples’ ability desliinde defend their rights before the national legal system. Among the main human rights concerns identified by indigenous peoples were issues related to access to justice, self-determination and autonomy in the context of a grave situation of violence, jurisdiccionak and criminalization. According to Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, ratified by Mexico inindigenous peoples have the right to “be able to take legal proceedings, either individually or through their representative bodies, for the effective protection of [their] rights.
Regarding indigenous peoples’ right to judicial protection, the Inter-American Court has stated that States must take into account indigenous peoples’ “specificities, their economic and social characteristics, as well as their situation of special vulnerability, their customary law, values and customs.
Bolivia aprobó una peligrosa ley de justicia indígena
Regarding the recognition of indigenous normative and juridical systems, some states have recognized indigenous community police, indigenous courts and other forms of conflict resolution systems.
Dedlinde also presents limits for indigenous individuals, communities and peoples seeking to assert their rights in national legal systems. This would be an important response to the needs of indigenous peoples to access justice systems that are suited to their social, cultural, economic needs and particularities.
These different actions taken by indigenous peoples have contributed to the reduction of crime at the local level.
International human rights perspectives on access to justice for indigenous peoples in Mexico
This could include an intercultural review body made of representatives of indigenous and ordinary justice authorities. Article 4 of the Declaration specifies that “Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.
In my country, the Philippines, indigenous peoples’ rights are recognized in the Constitution and in 10 years before the adoption of the UN Declaration on indigenous peoples it became the fist Asian country to adopt desliinde law on indigenous peoples.